| |
May 18, 2006
The Baltic Countries Entrance into the U.S. Visa Waiver Program
MR. SHIMKUS: Mr. Speaker, today I rise to speak in opposition to the
perceived exclusion of the countries of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from
an amendment adopted by the Senate in their immigration bill yesterday.
While I approve of this amendment to allow for a two year trial expansion of
the Visa Waiver Program, I disagree with the requirements that are placed
upon countries that would want to partcipate. This program enables nationals
of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business
for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.
According to the language of Senate Amendment 4000, a country must provide
‘material support’ which means that “the current provision of the equivalent
of, but not less than, a battalion (which consists of 300 to 1,000 military
personnel) to Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom to
provide training, logistical or tactical support, or a military presence.”
I feel that it is ineffective to place a number requirement on these smaller
countries in the region. All of the Baltic countries have been steadfast and
supportive allies of the United States since they gained their independence
following the fall of Soviet Union and have continued to be supportive in
the ongoing War on Terror.
While these countries are short of this amendment’s required troop number,
it seems to me that the best way to evaluate a country’s eligibility for the
Visa Waiver Program is to determine whether the country is a good ally and
friend to the United States, not put a number on their commitment. All of
these former Soviet satellite countries are continuing to actively work to
implement the highest of technology within their border security, including
biometric passports far ahead of some of their western European neighbors.
Currently, several of the 27 countries already in the Visa Waiver Program
have committed zero troops to either mission. Why should such a requirement
be placed on those countries that have already made a sacrifice when others
are rewarded for their non-participation?
Furthermore, small countries like Lithuania with a population of 3.5
million, Latvia with 2.8 million or Estonia at 1.3 million clearly do not
have as large a military as a country like Poland, which has over 38 million
citizens, 30 million more than all 3 Baltic States combined. I feel that it
is irresponsible to belittle their commitment and sacrifice to Operation
Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom by not allowing them into the
Visa Waiver Program within the specifics of the amendment.
Also, each of the Baltic States have troops participating in out of area
NATO missions. One of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan is
led by Lithuanian troops. Do these soldiers operating within the North
American Treaty Organization not count towards their troop commitment in the
language of this amendment? These are important questions that need to be
addressed.
As Co-Chairman of the House Baltic Caucus I understand the concerns the
Baltic countries have with this amendment and I urge the Conferees of the
immigration bill to keep their concerns in mind as we work through the
differences between both the Senate and House legislation.Congressman
John Shimkus (R-IL),
Co-Chair of the Baltic Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives
|
Lithuanian American Community
Baltic Caucus
of US Congress |